This humor is not for the faint of heart or easily offended, but it is a painfully accurate look at the true experience of depression. – Molly Allen, PsyD
http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2011/10/adventures-in-depression.html
This humor is not for the faint of heart or easily offended, but it is a painfully accurate look at the true experience of depression. – Molly Allen, PsyD
http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2011/10/adventures-in-depression.html
Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) 61st Annual Conference
Exercise a Viable Treatment Option for Mental Illness
October 21, 2011 (Vancouver, British Columbia) — Exercise is an effective, but potentially underused, treatment option for mental illness, experts say.
In a symposium presented here at the Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) 61st Annual Conference, Christopher Willer, MD, a senior psychiatry resident at the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, made the case for exercise as an adjunctive therapy.
Emerging research, he said, strongly suggests that exercise can improve patients’ physical and mental health and may help offset some of the metabolic effects associated with older antidepressants and newer atypical antipsychotics.
![]() |
|
Dr. Christopher Willer
|
“It’s not too soon to talk to patients about exercise as another treatment option, especially if they are asking about it or if they have a history of sport being important in their lives.
“There’s often a time lag between the time research comes out and when treatment guidelines are published. Based on the quality of the research that has been published [on exercise and mental illness] in the last 5 years, I think it would be irresponsible to wait,” Dr. Willer told Medscape Medical News.
In his presentation, Dr. Willer reviewed the existing literature for aerobic exercise as a treatment for mental illness, some of which suggests it can be as effective as pharmacotherapy and/or talk therapies.
However, potential mental health benefits aside, Dr. Willer noted that the physical benefits of exercise are clear and include reducing cardiovascular risk factors that are often associated with mental illness and the medications used to treat psychiatric disorders.
“Exercise mitigates certain illnesses; it protects against obesity, which certainly is a big problem with much of our patient population; and it has been shown to help with cognition and affective problems in well people.
“As psychiatrists, we have to remember that we’re not just concerned with our patients’ psychiatric symptoms but also their physical health. It is important that we promote an active lifestyle to our clients as part and parcel of good psychiatric treatment,” he said.
Antianxiety Properties
Early research examining exercise and depressive symptoms has been relatively simple, relying on case reports or short-term intervention studies. However, said Dr. Willer, in the past 5 years it has become more sophisticated.
“We’ve come a long way, and now there are randomized trials that are attempting to compare exercise to a sham version of exercise that include larger numbers of patients, so the studies are higher quality,” he said.
Most of the evidence to date supports the use of aerobic exercise in unipolar depression, he added.
However, a Cochrane review published in 2010 and reported byMedscape Medical News at that time showed that regular physical exercise in individuals with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses is feasible and may help improve the mental and physical well-being of these patients.
Nevertheless, although the overall results were positive, the review included only 3 small studies, prompting the authors to point out that larger randomized trials are needed “before any definitive conclusions can be drawn.”
Dr. Willer also noted that physical activity has been shown to have antianxiolytic properties.
In patients with anxiety, sometimes there is a concern that the somatic expression of exercise — elevated heart rate, sweating, and heavy breathing — may invoke a panic response, but the literature does not bear this out, said Dr. Willer.
“There are studies that suggest that in the moment, anxiety can be moderated by physical activity, and there are also studies showing 20 minutes of exercise a day for 10 weeks can modify on trait anxiety,” he added.
Worthwhile Endeavor
Dr. Willer pointed out that only about 30% of North Americans get the recommended amount of 150 minutes of exercise per week, and that the therapeutic dose for the treatment of mental illness is unclear. However, he noted, as the research becomes more refined, this will be elucidated.
In the meantime, he said, encouraging psychiatric patients to become more physically active is a worthwhile endeavor.
“It is not expensive, and it can be independent of the healthcare system. It doesn’t require [the psychiatrist] to be involved, other than to mentor patients and to check in with them,” he said.
![]() |
|
Dr. Saul Marks
|
Asked by Medscape Medical News to comment on Dr. Willer’s presentation and assertion that psychiatrists should consider exercise as a viable treatment option, Saul Marks, MD, a practicing sports psychiatrist at North York General Hospital in Toronto, said it is a routine part of his practice.
“Exercise confers a definite benefit. I have a patient myself who was able to come off antidepressant medication by taking up running, and she is doing extremely well now. There is a growing body of literature that psychiatric patients are at particular risk of metabolic syndrome, especially if they are taking atypical antipsychotics, suggesting psychiatrists need to promote exercise as a treatment,” said Dr. Marks.
Dr. Marks added that he routinely talks to his patients about the importance of being physically active every day.
“Even if they do something as simple as walking for 45 minutes a day, that will keep them physically fit and also help their mental health,” he said.
Dr. Willer and Dr. Marks have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) 61st Annual Conference: Abstract S11b Presented October 13, 2011.”
![]() |
|
Dr. Felice Jacka
|
In their latest study, published online September 21 in PLoS One, principal investigator Felice Jacka, PhD, and colleagues from Deakin University and the University of Melbourne in Australia found that better diet quality was associated with better mental health in adolescents cross-sectionally and over time.
Importantly, said Dr. Jacka, these findings suggest it may be possible to prevent teenage depression by ensuring adolescent diets are sufficiently nutritious, and improving diet quality may help treat depressive symptoms in this population.
She noted that three quarters of lifetime psychiatric disorders emerge in adolescence or early adulthood, and that a recent national survey showed more than 22% of adolescents aged 13 to 18 years had already experienced a clinically significant mental health problem.
“In this study we show that a good-quality diet at baseline predicts better mental health at follow-up, even after adjustments for diet quality at follow-up, sociodemographic variables, exercise, and most importantly, mental health at baseline,” Dr. Jacka told Medscape Medical News.
In addition, changes in diet quality over the course of 2 years were matched by changes in mental health during the same time, so children whose diets got worse had a worsening in their mental health, and those whose diet improved had improved mental health. “This was independent of every variable I could think to adjust for,” she added.
Better Nutrition, Better Mental Health
The longitudinal, prospective study included 2054 Australian adolescents aged 11 to 18 years at baseline who were participants in a project known as It’s Your Move, aimed to increase the capacity of schools to promote healthy eating and physical activity.
Study participants were sampled in 2005 to 2006, and again in 2007 to 2008. Students completed an 84-question survey designed to provide information on key behaviors such as nutrition, mental health and well-being, physical activity, and perceptions of home and school environment. Trained researchers measured students’ height and weight.
The investigators used a healthy diet score that was based on one previously developed and validated in adults to assess participants’ diet quality and correlated it with the emotional functioning subscale of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, an assessment measure for children’s mental health.
A healthy diet was defined as one that included fruit and vegetables as “core food groups” and included both 2 or more servings of fruit per day and 4 or more servings of vegetables, as well as general avoidance of processed foods including chips, fried foods, chocolate, sweets, and ice cream.
An unhealthy diet was high in snack and processed foods.
The investigators found that higher healthy diet scores at baseline predicted higher (better) Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scores at follow-up, whereas higher “unhealthy” baseline scores predicted poorer mental health.
Adolescents who improved the quality of their diets also experienced improved mental health. In contrast, those whose dietary quality deteriorated experience a worsening of their mental health status.
The investigators also found during the 2-year study period, adolescents who improved the quality of their diets also experienced improved mental health. In contrast, those whose dietary quality deteriorated experience a worsening of their mental health status.
More Processed Foods, Greater Anxiety
These latest findings come directly on the heels of another recent study by the same team of investigators that also examined the effect of diet and mental health.
Published in the July issue of Psychosomatic Medicine, this earlier study revealed a significant link between better-quality diets and improved mental health outcomes, and specifically depression and anxiety, in a cohort of Norwegian adult men and women.
“The dietary data we had in this study were very good, and we were able to see there were clear dietary patterns: a healthy pattern, an unhealthy pattern, and a ‘traditional’ dietary pattern that is indicative of the culture. In this case we had a distinct Norwegian traditional dietary pattern,” said Dr. Jacka.
The investigators constructed an a priori dietary score so that all participants received a value, and then compared that score against mental health outcomes, using the hospital anxiety and depression scale.
We found individuals with better quality diets were less likely to be depressed, whereas a higher intake of processed and unhealthy foods was associated with increased anxiety.
“We found individuals with better quality diets were less likely to be depressed, whereas a higher intake of processed and unhealthy foods was associated with increased anxiety,” the researchers write.
The findings from both articles mirror results of a previous study from 2010, conducted by Dr. Jacka and colleagues and reported by Medscape Medical News at that time, which examined diet and mental health outcomes in a cohort of Australian women across a wide range of ages.
Similar to the other 2 more recent papers, the findings from this large, cross-sectional study showed that women who regularly consumed a “whole” diet consisting of vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and high-quality meat and fish cut their risk for major depression, dysthmia, and anxiety disorders by more than 30%.
In comparison, their counterparts who consumed a so-called Western diet, which was high in refined or processed foods and saturated fats, had a 50% increased likelihood of depression.
Diverse Populations, Highly Consistent Data
Although all of these studies have been conducted in different populations, the findings are “remarkably similar,” said Dr. Jacka.
These observational data, including effect sizes, are highly consistent, which is unusual in a new area of study in psychiatry, or any other area of medicine for that matter. We’ve seen this right across the world.
“These observational data, including effect sizes, are highly consistent, which is unusual in a new area of study in psychiatry, or any other area of medicine for that matter. We’ve seen this right across the world: in Australia, the United Kingdom, Japan, Spain, the United States, and now in Norway. We are seeing it in adolescents as well as adults; in males as well as females. It is very consistent.”
Although the underlying mechanisms are not clear, there are several hypotheses.
“We know that diet quality has a real impact on your immune system and oxidative stress. It affects gene expression, and it has a potent impact on the neurotrophic factors, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which we know are particularly relevant in psychiatric illness. We think it is plausible that through dietary change we can modulate these biologic factors and, over time, modulate the risk for depression and anxiety,” she said.
With 5 papers on diet quality and mental health published since early 2010, Dr. Jacka and colleagues are arguably the world’s leaders in this new research area. However, there have been other recent noteworthy studies supporting a link between diet and mental health.
For instance, another study published earlier this year in PLoS ONE and reported by Medscape Medical News showed that consumption of trans fats was linked to a significant increased risk for depression, whereas monounsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids lowered depression risk.
New Approach to Mental Illness?
This growing body of evidence, said Dr. Jacka, hints at the possibility of an exciting new approach to preventing and treating common mental illnesses, including depression and anxiety.
At this time, only about 30% of patients with depression respond to antidepressant medication, and a similar proportion respond to psychotherapy, said Dr. Jacka.
Given that the majority of mental health problems start before age 25, and the enormous burden of illness of depression and anxiety in young people, and given that nutrition is so critical to adequate development, we think these data have enormous significant implications for public health.
“Given that the majority of mental health problems start before age 25, and the enormous burden of illness of depression and anxiety in young people, and given that nutrition is so critical to adequate development, we think these data have enormous significant implications for public health,” she said.
However, before physicians can feel confident about treating common mental illnesses with diet, there’s an “enormous research gap” that needs to be filled.
“We need pivotal randomized controlled intervention trials to answer the question ‘If I improve my diet, will my mental health — particularly depression — improve?’ ”
We need pivotal randomized controlled intervention trials to answer the question ‘If I improve my diet, will my mental health — particularly depression — improve?’
During the past year there also have been a couple of intervention studies suggesting that long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may be beneficial in preventing psychosis and treating anxiety.
Most notably, results of a 2010 randomized placebo controlled trial conducted by Paul Amminger, MD, from the Oxygen Research Centre in Melbourne, Australia, and reported by Medscape Medical News, showed that fish oil supplements prevented conversion from a subthreshold psychotic state to full-blown schizophrenia.
Another recent randomized controlled trial study by investigators at the Ohio State University College of Medicine in Columbus suggested that omega-3 supplements may help reduce anxiety.
Are You What Your Mother Ate?
Dr. Jacka noted that her team has applied for funding to conduct a randomized controlled trial of diet and mental health outcomes.
“So far we know exercise is a very effective treatment strategy for depression, but we have yet to determine whether dietary improvement is an effective treatment strategy,” she said.
However, she added, even in the absence of intervention studies, it is not too soon for physicians to raise the issue of diet with patients suffering from anxiety and depression.
“We already know that a good diet and exercise are critical in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease and obesity, both of which are extremely common in people with mental illness. So for these reasons alone, diet and exercise should be at the top of the list of things physicians discuss with their patients.
“Also, based on this very consistent literature that has emerged over the last 18 months, I think we are pretty safe in saying diet is important in mental health. The only thing we don’t know for sure is whether diet can improve mental health outcomes. But certainly, based on what we know from epidemiological evidence, I’d be quite confident in recommending physicians address lifestyle in patients with depression and anxiety,” she said.
Dr. Jacka also plans to study prenatal nutrition and early childhood diet as they relate to mental health outcomes in offspring.
“I’d like to think that in the not-too-distant future we may be able to say whether or not the diet that a mother eats when she is pregnant and the diet children eat in those first few years has an influence on whether a child will go on to develop depression and anxiety in their teens,” she said.
In addition, the investigators hope to receive funding to examine biomarker data in the cohort of Australian women to determine whether diet influences biological markers of depression including oxidative stress, proinflammatory cytokines, and peripherally circulating brain derived neurotrophic factor, and whether these findings correlate with mental health outcomes.
‘We hope to continue to develop this evidence base and work towards a public health message on primary prevention of depression and anxiety,” she said.
Dr. Jacka and colleagues have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
PLosOne. Published online September 21, 2011.
For quite a long time Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, or PTSD, was thought to be caused only by extreme stressful situations, like being in combat in war. However, in the 80′s researchers realized that sexual abuse also can result in PTSD symptoms. Likewise, other sorts of significant stressful situations, such as being in a really bad car accident can cause PTSD.
Other kinds of events that can cause PTSD include:
Dr. Molly Allen explains there are several types of PTSD symptoms. “They include hyper vigilance, flashbacks, social withdrawal, bad dreams, depression, anxiety, hopelessness, or anger outbursts.” Because PTSD symptoms can come and go, it is possible have more when things are stressful in general, or when you run into reminders of what you went through. You may hear a car backfire and relive combat experiences. Or you may see a report on the news about a rape and feel overcome by memories of your own assault. Additionally, Dr. Allen says “some odd PTSD symptoms have to do with experiencing a ‘foreshortened future orientation,’ that is, PTSD-sufferers sometimes tell therapists they have a sense that they will not live long. Until they compare these perceptions to others, they often feel like they are the only one that experiences this symptom.”
Dr. Molly Allen explains her type of therapy for PTSD: “Often, what I use with PTSD seems counter to what the patient has believed would help. That is, I have them verbally walk through the trauma, in order to demystify the situation, and to desensitize the patient from the trauma they have avoided dealing with. Sometimes,” she continues, “patients do not want to come back, since they have avoided thinking about, talking about, or considering the trauma, but I usually explain that the only way to get past it is to get through it. I also advise patients to get on a healthy schedule of sleep, eating, work or school, leisure, social life, etc, so they can take care of the ‘body-basics’ to give them strength. We usually use some Cognitive Behavioral or Emotion Focused Therapy to validate some of their perceptions, and to debunk some of the ‘mythology’ they have developed about themselves. For example, some of the patients have the mistaken notion that they will always feel in emotional pain – when research tells us that with appropriate treatment they can experience significant relief from symptoms.” And Dr. Allen says support groups can help, too. “Some patients,” she says, “benefit from participation in support groups ‘in vivo’, or on-line. Particularly, patients who have served in military combat situations or civilian sorts of jobs in firefighting or police work tend to come from a particular culture that outsiders do not understand.”
As for medication, Dr. Allen is cautious. “I do refer out for medication management,” says, “particularly the use of antidepressants, but I try to get patients to be very sparing in their use of sleeping pills and anxiety medications, since there is a temptation to overuse these drugs. I also routinely question ongoing PTSD patients about the use of other mind-numbing practices such as drugs and alcohol, shopping, gambling or compulsive sexual habits.”
Dr. Allen stresses that “Each patient is different; there is no cookie cutter approach. The best bet is to get them talking early, get in touch with appropriate supports, and get back to living their life.”
This is more evidence that the positive energy we muster as we approach a challenge is as important as our skill, our experience, and our resources. – Molly Allen, PsyD
Obtained from Association for Psychological Science
Find this press release and its web enhancements at: http://bit.ly/nQW9Wm
PRESS RELEASE
September 29, 2011
Contact: Divya Menon
Association for Psychological Science
202.293.9300
dmenon@psychologicalscience.org
How Your Brain Reacts To Mistakes Depends On Your Mindset
“Whether you think you can or think you can’t—you’re right,” said Henry Ford. A new study, to be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, finds that people who think they can learn from their mistakes have a different brain reaction to mistakes than people who think intelligence is fixed.
“One big difference between people who think intelligence is malleable and those who think intelligence is fixed is how they respond to mistakes,” says Jason S. Moser, of Michigan State University, who collaborated on the new study with Hans S. Schroder, Carrie Heeter, Tim P. Moran, and Yu-Hao Lee. Studies have found that people who think intelligence is malleable say things like, “When the going gets tough, I put in more effort” or “If I make a mistake, I try to learn and figure it out.” On the other hand, people who think that they can’t get smarter will not take opportunities to learn from their mistakes. This can be a problem in school, for example; a student who thinks her intelligence is fixed will think it’s not worth bothering to try harder after she fails a test.
For this study, Moser and his colleagues gave participants a task that is easy to make a mistake on. They were supposed to identify the middle letter of a five-letter series like “MMMMM” or “NNMNN.” Sometimes the middle letter was the same as the other four, and sometimes it was different. “It’s pretty simple, doing the same thing over and over, but the mind can’t help it; it just kind of zones out from time to time,” Moser says. That’s when people make mistakes—and they notice it immediately, and feel stupid.
While doing the task, the participant wore a cap on his or her head that records electrical activity in the brain. When someone makes a mistake, their brain makes two quick signals: an initial response that indicates something has gone awry—Moser calls it the “’oh crap’ response”—and a second that indicates the person is consciously aware of the mistake and is trying to right the wrong. Both signals occur within a quarter of a second of the mistake. After the experiment, the researchers found out whether people believed they could learn from their mistakes or not.
People who think they can learn from their mistakes did better after making a mistake – in other words, they successfully bounced back after an error. Their brains also reacted differently, producing a bigger second signal, the one that says “I see that I’ve made a mistake, so I should pay more attention” Moser says.
The research shows that these people are different on a fundamental level, Moser says. “This might help us understand why exactly the two types of individuals show different behaviors after mistakes.” People who think they can learn from their mistakes have brains that are tuned to pay more attention to mistakes, he says. This research could help in training people to believe that they can work harder and learn more, by showing how their brain is reacting to mistakes.
###
For more information about this study, please contact: Jason S. Moser at jmoser@msu.edu.